netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do w

To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN)
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:39:42 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Ion Badulescu <ionut@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>, lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101310213400.13467-100000@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote:

>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
>
> > > - is this UDP or TCP based? (UDP i guess)
> > >
> > TCP
>
> well then i'd suggest to do:
>
>       echo 100000 100000 100000 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem
>
> does this make any difference?

According to my notes, i dont see this.
however, 262144 into /proc/sys/net/core/*mem_max/default.

I have access to my h/ware this weekend. Hopefully i should get something
better than ttcp to use.

cheers,
jamal


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>