netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] dynamic IP support for 2.4.0 (SIOCKILLADDR)

To: Jamie Lokier <ln@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dynamic IP support for 2.4.0 (SIOCKILLADDR)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:08:40 +0100
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@xxxxxxxxxx>, John Fremlin <vii@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, paulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ppp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010129193136.A11035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from ln@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:31:36PM +0100
References: <m2d7d838sj.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200101290245.f0T2j2Y438757@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010129135905.B1591@xxxxxxxxxx> <20010129193136.A11035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:31:36PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> The important thing is that the tunnel is destroyed and recreated (it
> has to be, it is over different underlying link addresses).  I do not
> want that to destroy the connections from the tunnelled address.

Just do not set IFF_DYNAMIC on the tunnel interface then, that is why it is a 
flag and not hardcoded.

-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>