Re: ECN: Clearing the air

To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: ECN: Clearing the air
From:	Walter Hofmann <walter.hofmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:21:55 +0100
Cc:	jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20010128225530.A1300@xxxxxxxxxx>; from pavel@xxxxxxx on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:55:30PM +0100
References:	<20010128150813.A1595@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.30.0101272110470.24762-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010128225530.A1300@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.2i

On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Does not that mean that Linux 2.0.10 mistakenly announces it is ECN
> capable when offered ECN connection?

No, the RFC deals with this.

Walter

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
ECN: Clearing the air, jamal Re: ECN: Clearing the air, jamal Re: ECN: Clearing the air, Chris Wedgwood Re: ECN: Clearing the air, jamal Re: ECN: Clearing the air, Pavel Machek Re: ECN: Clearing the air, Walter Hofmann <= Re: ECN: Clearing the air, jamal

Previous by Date:	RE: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Jonathan Earle
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] dynamic IP support for 2.4.0 (SIOCKILLADDR), Jamie Lokier
Previous by Thread:	Re: ECN: Clearing the air, Pavel Machek
Next by Thread:	Re: ECN: Clearing the air, jamal
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]