| To: | Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:47:22 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010116001633.A3343@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Pavel Machek wrote: > > TWO observations: > > - Given Linux's non-pre-emptability of the kernel i get the feeling that > > sendfile could starve other user space programs. Imagine trying to send a > > 1Gig file on 10Mbps pipe in one shot. > > Hehe, try sigkilling process doing that transfer. Last time I tried it > it did not work. >From Alexey's response: it does get descheduled possibly every sndbuf send. So you should be able to sneak that sigkill. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: routable interfaces, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: routable interfaces, Gleb Natapov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, Pavel Machek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, Pavel Machek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |