netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch,

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: dean-list-linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1)
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:58:07 -0800
Cc: mingo@xxxxxxx, riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101091826200.10428-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (message from dean gaudet on Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:56:33 -0800 (PST))
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101091826200.10428-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:56:33 -0800 (PST)
   From: dean gaudet <dean-list-linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx>

   is NFS receive single copy today?

With the zerocopy patches, NFS client receive is "single cpu copy" if
that's what you mean.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@xxxxxxxxxx
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch,, Alan Cox
Next by Date:  Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1), dean gaudet
Previous by Thread:  Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch,, Alan Cox
Next by Thread:  Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1), dean gaudet
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]