| To: | greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks) |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 7 Jan 2001 23:00:45 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3A597665.4B68C39@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (message from Ben Greear on Mon, 08 Jan 2001 01:12:21 -0700) |
| References: | <3A578F27.D2A9DF52@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010107042959.A14330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A580B31.7998C783@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010107062744.A15198@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A58249F.86DD52BC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A597665.4B68C39@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 01:12:21 -0700 From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://grok.yi.org/~greear/hashed_dev.png (If you can't get to it, let me know and I'll email it to you...some cable modem networks have I firewalled.) It just seems that this shows that the implementation of ifconfig can be improved, since "ip" can do the same thing several orders of magnitude better (ie. non-quadratic system time complexity). This is the argument I started with when this thread began, so my position hasn't changed, it has in fact been well supported by your tests :-) Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks), Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks), Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks), Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |