| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) |
| From: | David Ford <david@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 7 Jan 2001 02:22:31 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010107162905.B1804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > Virtual IP interfaces in the form of ifname:<number> (e.g. eth:1) IMO > should be deprecated and removed completely in 2.5.x. It's an ugly > external wart that should be removed. > > That said, if this was done -- how would things like routing daemons > and bind cope? Actually, when I think about it they can't cope with > situating like this now: > > tapu:~# ip addr show lo > 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 3904 qdisc noqueue > link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 > inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo > inet 10.0.0.1/32 scope global lo BIND copes just fine, how would it not? I haven't heard any problems with routing daemons either. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |