| To: | eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: BUG in tcp.c ? |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:30:37 -0700 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200010102221.AAA18853@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (message from Henner Eisen on Wed, 11 Oct 2000 00:21:21 +0200) |
| References: | <200010101501.TAA14198@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200010102221.AAA18853@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 00:21:21 +0200 From: Henner Eisen <eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Is it only the sleep while waiting for GFP_KERNEL memory allocation which causes the deadlock problems? To the best of my understanding, yes, this was nbd's problem precisely. Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Henner Eisen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | When are net_device names changed/changeable?, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Henner Eisen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |