Re: BUG in tcp.c ?

To:	kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: BUG in tcp.c ?
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:32:14 -0700
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200010071414.SAA30580@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
References:	<200010071414.SAA30580@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

   From: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
   Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 18:14:26 +0400 (MSK DST)

   > I've fixed it in my 2.2.x sources as well.

   Dave, sendmsg cannot be used from interrupt yet.

NBD is not desiring this, as Andi described.

Regardless, having TCP ignore sk->allocation yet datagram sockets
respect it is a real bug.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@xxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
BUG in tcp.c ?, Rik van Riel Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Marcelo Tosatti Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Andi Kleen Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Marcelo Tosatti Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller <= Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Henner Eisen Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Rik van Riel Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Rik van Riel Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Henner Eisen Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Marcelo Tosatti

Previous by Date:	Filtering outgoing tunneled IPv6 packets with ipchains - possible?, Peter Bieringer
Next by Date:	Wavelan busted in 2.4.test9?, Ben Greear
Previous by Thread:	Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Marcelo Tosatti
Next by Thread:	Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]