| To: | misiek@xxxxxxxxxx (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: scope id question |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sun, 24 Sep 2000 17:33:31 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20000924131934.A15731@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Arkadiusz Miskiewicz" at Sep 24, 0 03:45:01 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Draft scopedaddr-format says that quering getaddrinfo() with > only link-local address (without scope id/interface name) is ok Hence it says a non-sense. > so I assume that connect()tion to link local address > (with sin6_scope_id = 0) should be ok for kernel, too. It is undefined without any doubts. Mapping scoped addresses without scope id is impossible even theoretically. No hacks selecting random scope id are to be accepted. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Archives of the Linux netdev mailing list, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.4.0-test8: BUG at skbuff.c:93!, Ilkka Oksanen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: scope id question, 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | Archives of the Linux netdev mailing list, Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |