netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IPv6 in IPv6

To: Lars Henrik Petander <lpetande@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPv6 in IPv6
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 16:54:03 +0200
Cc: NetDevel List <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10008151357490.26574-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from lpetande@xxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 01:06:57PM +0200
References: <20000814185756.43609@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SOL.4.10.10008151357490.26574-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Lars Henrik Petander wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 04:29:05PM +0200, Maciej 'Agaran' Pijanka wrote:
> > > Hello
> > > Could anyone tell me if exist that possibility for linux 2.2.x ?
> > > something like reversed sit..
> > > i looked at sources..but all things bases on ipv4..hashing and so on..
> > 
> > ftp.suse.com:/pub/people/ak/tunnel/fourtun-2.tgz is a simple v4-in-v6
> > tunnel for Linux 2.2. It requires static tunnel setup.
> 
> Sounds interesting. Has anyone implemented v6-in-v6 tunneling
> with virtual devices for the 2.4 kernels? 

Fourtun should handle v6-in-SIT-in-v4-over-v6. It would also not be very hard
to extend it to v6-in-v6. Fourtun is 2.2 only ATM and may miss some of the SMP
locking required for 2.4.

-Andi

-- 
This is like TV. I don't like TV.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>