| To: | Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: nfmark routing in ip_route_output() |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 13 Aug 2000 04:30:35 +0200 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20000812173439.285B58172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 07:36:28PM +0200 |
| References: | <20000812173439.285B58172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 07:36:28PM +0200, Rusty Russell wrote: > Forgot this one. > > Can we add an argument for nfmark field in ip_route_output()? Needed > so local traffic can be routed in complex ways (mark altered in > NF_IP_LOCAL_OUT). > > The other option is less invasive: make route_me_harder call > ip_route_output_slow() directly, and simply add the parameter there. > > Trivial patch follows, It seems it is missing the patch to route.c I also do not understand why you cannot simply change skb->nfmark before calling ip_route_output. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | nfmark routing in ip_route_output(), Rusty Russell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: nfmark routing in ip_route_output(), kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | nfmark routing in ip_route_output(), Rusty Russell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: nfmark routing in ip_route_output(), kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |