| To: | Stefan Schlott <stefan.schlott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Adding of destination options in IPv6 |
| From: | Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Jul 2000 00:04:53 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20000711221316.A1386@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from stefan.schlott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 10:13:16PM +0200 |
| References: | <396AFFA9.A64FEDCB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200007111512.TAA16460@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20000711221316.A1386@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2i |
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 10:13:16PM +0200, Stefan Schlott wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > and receiving; the same thing for forwarding would result in an "always
> > > defragment" option, which would be somewhat "un-ip6-ish" :-)
> > It is anti-ip4-ish with the same success. 8)
> :-)
>
> > My personal opinion is that current mobile IPv6 is one big piece
> > of shit yet. 8)8) Piggibacking such options to data packets
> > introduces no advantages, but lots of troubles.
> It's even worse... I am working on IPsec ;-)
On which implementation are you working? What platform/OS? Is it
GPL?
Are you coming to OLS?
> Stefan.
slainte mhath, RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs -- PGP key available Auto-Free Ottawa! Canada
<www.conscoop.ottawa.on.ca/rgb/> <www.flora.org/afo/>
Prevent Internet Wiretapping! -- FreeS/WAN:<www.freeswan.org>
Thanks for voting Green! -- <green.ca> Marillion:<www.marillion.co.uk>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TCP - Kernel module. Success!!, Andy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] Bogus extra bytes in ICMP errors in 2.3.0-test3-7, Rusty Russell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Adding of destination options in IPv6, Stefan Schlott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Adding of destination options in IPv6, Lars Henrik Petander |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |