[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Adding of destination options in IPv6

To: Stefan Schlott <stefan.schlott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Adding of destination options in IPv6
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 00:04:53 -0400
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20000711221316.A1386@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from stefan.schlott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 10:13:16PM +0200
References: <396AFFA9.A64FEDCB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200007111512.TAA16460@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20000711221316.A1386@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2i
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 10:13:16PM +0200, Stefan Schlott wrote:
> Hello,
> > > and receiving; the same thing for forwarding would result in an "always
> > > defragment" option, which would be somewhat "un-ip6-ish" :-)
> > It is anti-ip4-ish with the same success. 8)
> :-)
> > My personal opinion is that current mobile IPv6 is one big piece
> > of shit yet. 8)8) Piggibacking such options to data packets
> > introduces no advantages, but lots of troubles.

> It's even worse... I am working on IPsec ;-)

On which implementation are you working?  What platform/OS?  Is it

Are you coming to OLS?

> Stefan.

        slainte mhath, RGB
Richard Guy Briggs -- PGP key available            Auto-Free Ottawa! Canada
<>                       <>
Prevent Internet Wiretapping!        --        FreeS/WAN:<>
Thanks for voting Green! -- <>      Marillion:<>

Attachment: pgpZuxz5JKIQA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>