netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: netfilter NAT vs. pump

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: netfilter NAT vs. pump
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 11:55:34 -0400
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Jun 2000 09:58:00 +0200." <200006140758.JAA12654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> "Werner" == Werner Almesberger <almesber@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
    Werner> Michael Richardson wrote:
    >> Yes, it does. When doing a request, you must use address 0.0.0.0
    >> according to the spec.

    Werner> Okay, then it's probably impossible to get correct behaviour with
    Werner> the current design of pump if there's already another configured
    Werner> interface.

  There is a reason that ISC dhclient uses raw sockets to send the requests,
and BPF to get the replies :-)

    Werner> So I guess I agree - time to dump pump.

  Pump dump lump!

   :!mcr!:            |  Solidum Systems Corporation, http://www.solidum.com
   Michael Richardson |For a better connected world,where data flows faster<tm>
 Personal: http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/People/Michael_Richardson/Bio.html
        mailto:mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx       mailto:mcr@xxxxxxxxxxx



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>