netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???

To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???
From: Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12 Jun 2000 16:31:07 +0200
Cc: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rob@xxxxxxxxxxx, buytenh@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Gleb Natapov's message of "Mon, 12 Jun 2000 12:54:00 +0000"
References: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0006120739590.1773-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3944DD68.3AB7DDEB@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.4
>>>>> "Gleb" == Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Gleb> Answer me this question: are you going to change something in
Gleb> net/ipv4/ directory in your VLAN implementation?

Gleb> If answer is yes, you implementation is broken IMO.  If answer
Gleb> is no, I really want to see your code.

There is *nothing* wrong with having to change code in say the ipv4
directory if that provides a better solution. Trying to avoid code
changes is not a goal in itself - the target for Linux is not to avoid
changing code but to provide the best solution.

Jes

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>