netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???

To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???
From: Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Jun 2000 05:15:34 +0200
Cc: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rob@xxxxxxxxxxx, buytenh@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Gleb Natapov's message of "Sat, 10 Jun 2000 17:54:38 +0300 (IDT)"
References: <Pine.OSF.3.96-heb-2.07.1000610174812.19185A-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.4
>>>>> "Gleb" == Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> 
jamal> Did i miss anything?
jamal> 
Gleb> Yes. If you are going to implement VLANs as you've just
Gleb> described you will have to change each L3 protocol
Gleb> implementation to support VLANs.
>>  Gleb, I am afraid i didnt understand you. You mean broken programs
>> like DHCP?

Gleb> No, I mean IPV6, IPX, DECnet, appletalk etc.

You mean all the ones that are practically unused (and the used ones
which should never have been used in the first place: IPX + AppleTalk).

Jes

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>