[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 17:54:38 +0300 (IDT)
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rob@xxxxxxxxxxx, buytenh@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0006100852590.187-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> jamal> Did i miss anything?
> jamal> 
> Gleb> Yes. If you are going to implement VLANs as you've just described
> Gleb> you will have to change each L3 protocol implementation  
> Gleb> to support VLANs.
> Gleb, I am afraid i didnt understand you. You mean broken programs like

No, I mean IPV6, IPX, DECnet, appletalk etc.

> cheers,
> jamal


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>