| To: | Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Slow TCP connection between linux and wince |
| From: | Aki M Laukkanen <amlaukka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Jun 2000 13:37:43 +0300 (EET DST) |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20000605014025.A1183@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Pavel Machek wrote: > 64 bytes from 192.168.55.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=32 time=110.1 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.55.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=32 time=110.0 ms Assuming 84 bytes altogether, this is quite close to 19200 bps. I get about 90-100 ms for RTT. > This is well possible. Their TCP stack is probably designed to work at > 19200. Is there way for us to missbehave? Ie. what would happen if I > forced linux tcp stack to think their window is bigger than it really > is? [Is there easy way to break my tcp stack this way?] See, http://arstechnica.com/reviews/2q00/networking/networking-1.html |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Slow TCP connection between linux and wince, Pavel Machek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Slow TCP connection between linux and wince, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |