[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???

To: gleb@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???
From: Rob Walker <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 11:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: rob@xxxxxxxxxxx, buytenh@xxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, gleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3937EA35.423CB3C8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0006020741140.13652-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006021439170.19298-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <14647.58672.343104.432906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3937EA35.423CB3C8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: rob@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> On Fri, 02 Jun 2000 17:09:09 +0000, Gleb Natapov
>>>>> <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:

Gleb> Rob Walker wrote:
Gleb> <snip>

>> Why should VLANs not be fake devices?  How are they different from
>> aliased interfaces?

Gleb> Not so good example IMHO. Aliased interfaces are deprecated ;)

well, that shows what I know.  :-)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>