netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 3c59x.c v0.99H 24May00 failed with two 3c905 Boomerangs

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 3c59x.c v0.99H 24May00 failed with two 3c905 Boomerangs
From: "Anders K. Pedersen" <akp@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 19:48:16 +0200
Newsgroups: akp.lists.linux.netdev
Organization: AKP Consult I/S
References: <392BF0E3.2A6D4DFC@xxxxxx> <392BF736.F95AB01@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Anders K. Pedersen" wrote:
> > I tried the 3c59x.c v0.99H 24May00 on a machine with two 3c905
> > Boomerang cards. It generated a lot of error messages in the kernel
> > log, and neither card were reachable through the network, after
> > starting this driver. I have attached the kernel messages as a gzip
> > compressed file.
> >
> > Kernel is 2.2.15, and the last startup of the driver in the attached
> > log is with the standard driver from this kernel, which we have not
> > experienced any problems with.
> 
> A "catastrophic Host error".  Receive underruns on both NICs, caused by
> the host reading data faster than the NIC is receiving it.  That's a new
> one.
> 
> This is a different machine, I assume?  Is there anything in common
> which could cause them to play up?

It is a pentium 133 (with F0 0F bug) working as a firewall for a 256
kbit
Internet connection, so the load values on this machine is very low 
(close to zero most of the time). There are no resource conflicts that I
am aware of - eth0 is at int 10 base address 0xe000 and eth1 is at int
11
base address 0xd800.

> I'll send you a few other drivers to try..

I have sent the results directly to you.

Regards,
Anders K. Pedersen

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>