On Sat, 20 May 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
> Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 04:31:33 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Donald Becker <becker@xxxxxxxxx>
> And if that's acceptable behavior, I have a new version of
> del_timer() that's very small and fast ;->.
> How do you accomplish this and still respect the environment of the
> timer function itself, ie. that the timer is not scheduled and outside
> of self-inflicted locking issues the timer function may add it's timer.
You trimmed a bit much, and missed the ";->".
My comment was that if the timer routine may be run after del_timer() is
called, then del_timer() might as well not do anything.
Donald Becker becker@xxxxxxxxx
Scyld Computing Corporation
410 Severn Ave. Suite 210
Annapolis MD 21403