| To: | greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH 2.2.14 net/core/dev.c |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 May 2000 19:10:33 -0700 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dlr@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <390F8D3F.3DC6F7CB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (message from Ben Greear on Tue, 02 May 2000 19:21:51 -0700) |
| References: | <200005021448.SAA14593@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <390F8D3F.3DC6F7CB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 19:21:51 -0700 From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > That's why dev_alloc_name() is limited to two digits. And the > maximum is not 99, as people extending it to 999 think, but > 15. (When output of "ip link ls" still fits to one screen 8)8)) I know of a box that is running 50 virtual IP interfaces. It seems to run just fine, so it seems the code supports more interfaces... Btw, I was planning on using source-routing (ie the ip command) in a PC with 20 real ethernet interfaces. Does this mean that the ip command will not support that? Please notice Alexey's smiley, and then reread his words. He isn't stating that it cannot function, he is saying it "does not function" in terms of practicality. Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH 2.2.14 net/core/dev.c, Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tx_timeout and timer serialisation, Andrey Savochkin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH 2.2.14 net/core/dev.c, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH 2.2.14 net/core/dev.c, Daniel L. Rall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |