| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | MSG_EOR flag |
| From: | Henner Eisen <eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 28 Feb 2000 23:21:33 +0100 |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi, somewhere in 2.3.x, sock_write() was changed to call proto_ops.sendmsg() of SOCK_SEQPACK sockets with MSG_EOR flag set (which broke some protocols first). My questions now are: how should the MSG_EOR be used consistently? Should sockets which do not support sending fragments via sendmsg refuse to accept sendmsg without MSG_EOR set? This seems consistent, but can cause compatibility problems with 2.2.x kernels. How should the MSG_EOR flag affect recvmsg()? Henner |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: shared-state firewalls/routers, Lars Marowsky-Bree |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bug found on Linux kernel 2.2.13 about ipv6 stack, Wang Hui |
| Previous by Thread: | ppp_channel_ops.start_xmit(), Henner Eisen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MSG_EOR flag, Steve Whitehouse |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |