| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses |
| From: | Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Feb 2000 18:16:29 -0800 |
| Cc: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, misiek@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | In your message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:25:44 +0300 (MSK)" <200002221725.UAA23593@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Information Sciences Institute |
| References: | <20000222224028Z.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200002221725.UAA23593@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Wanderlust/2.2.15 (More Than Words) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 8) (Bryce Canyon) (sparc-sun-solaris2.7) |
At Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:25:44 +0300 (MSK), kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Hello, > Low level ioctl() set is different question and it is not > an important question at all. I think that overloading SIOCGIFCONF > does not make much of sense in 4.3BSD framework, which Linux is. > BTW do you know how does Solaris work? I'm not an expert of Solaris, but AFAIK, solaris always return the 16byte buffer by SIOCGIFCONF. Using SIOCGLIFCONF, it returns long buffer than 16byte. In order to get sockaddr_in6, we can use SIOCGLIFCONF. -- SEKIYA Yuji USC/ISI Computer Networks Division 7 <sekiya@xxxxxxx / sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx / sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | sin6_scope_id (Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses), Hideaki YOSHIFUJI |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: routing tricks, Rusty Russell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sin6_scope_id (Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses), Yuji Sekiya |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |