| To: | Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: PPP over X |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Feb 2000 17:19:44 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxx, Mark Spencer <markster@xxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Marc Boucher <marc@xxxxxxx>, Ben LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <0002081230340C.09952@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Mon, 07 Feb 2000, jamal wrote: > > That still leaves a race where I can grab your channel. Actually it would > probably be better to say that only root can grab a channel. Would there still be a race if multiple root processes tried to grab the channel? >> Backporting sounds like a huge pain to me. And would this be a separate >> patch or part of the kernel proper? 2.2 is considered to be a stable >> release. >It wouldn't be that much of a pain, I actually developed it under 2.2 for >a while before 2.3 came along. Ok, but then do we want this to be part of 2.2? cheers jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Michal Ostrowski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Paul Mackerras |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Paul Mackerras |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |