| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sin6_scope_id |
| From: | Hideaki YOSHIFUJI (吉藤英明) <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:44:00 +0900 |
| Cc: | sekiya@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, users@xxxxxxxx, bound@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200001130359.WAA0000007676@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200001111309.QAA10035@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200001130359.WAA0000007676@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Alexey, In article <200001130359.WAA0000007676@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:59:34 -0500), Jim Bound <bound@xxxxxxxxxxx> says: > .. I suggest to you that Linux > does not want to be the only platform that does not support scopes. We, Sekiya, I and other Linux IPv6 Users JP members, discussed on this issue, and now we think Linux must not go wrong. Delays are dangerous. Let's make a room for sin6_scope_id as soon as possible. (I know you are busy, but the best to do is to add into 2.3.x kernels.) After that, support code for sin6_scope_id should be added. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Web Page: http://www.ecei.tohoku.ac.jp/%7Eyoshfuji/ PGP5i FP: F731 6599 5EB2 BBA7 1515 1323 1806 A96F 5700 6B25 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: sin6_scope_id, Jim Bound |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: linux-ipsec: Re: current IPSEC/SKIP implementations?, Michael H. Warfield |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sin6_scope_id, Jim Bound |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sin6_scope_id, lordbeatnik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |