netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: current IPSEC/SKIP implementations?

To: Greg Simpson <gws@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: current IPSEC/SKIP implementations?
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 03:15:15 -0500
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.00.10001110110240.19157-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20000111004619.H2961@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.00.10001110110240.19157-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 01:12:17AM -0500, Greg Simpson wrote:
> Frees/wan looks very neat.
> 
> A little bit off topic for the list, but are there any free ipsec clients
> for windows available? Or any commercial ones that you'd recommend?
> Is it safe to assume they can all talk to each other, or are there some
> proprietary schemes to avoid?

IPSEC is a set of open proposed standards, RFC2401, etc., so they
*should* all talk to each other, but YMMV until this stuff gets ironed
out.  They are not simple protocols.  I don't know the M$ offerings at
all.  There is an interoperability workshop on as we speak in
California.

> -g
> 
> > >  Michael H. Warfield    |  (770) 985-6132   |  mhw@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> >     slainte mhath, RGB

        slainte mhath, RGB
-- 
Richard Guy Briggs -- PGP key available            Auto-Free Ottawa! Canada
<www.conscoop.ottawa.on.ca/rgb/>                       <www.flora.org/afo/>
Prevent Internet Wiretapping!        --        FreeS/WAN:<www.freeswan.org>
Thanks for voting Green! -- <green.ca>      Marillion:<www.marillion.co.uk>

Attachment: pgp5CyNzUtAFc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>