| To: | Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sin6_scope_id |
| From: | Jim Bound <bound@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Jan 2000 19:56:15 -0500 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, users@xxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Mon, 10 Jan 2000 15:55:01 PST." <xmsk8lhscru.wl@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
folks, Everyone has to support sin6_scope_id. This all has been discussed on ipng list. There will be an update to rfc2553 soon in the space of sin6_scope_id. It will not affect kernel implementations of scopes or rfc2553 implementations of that API. It will be an enhancement to the API. /jim |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: sin6_scope_id, Yuji Sekiya |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: current IPSEC/SKIP implementations?, Richard Guy Briggs |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sin6_scope_id, Yuji Sekiya |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sin6_scope_id, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |