Hey Eric,<br><br>Good point! We're running CentOS 5, so is the CentOS-Plus repo the way to go? These servers are all setup from a fairly old base image hence using kmod-xfs, definitely something I'll address.<br>
<br>Cheers<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Eric Sandeen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sandeen@sandeen.net">sandeen@sandeen.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 4/15/12 8:15 AM, Drew Wareham wrote:<br>
> Hello Everyone,<br>
><br>
> Hopefully this is the correct kind of information to send to this list.<br>
><br>
> I have an issue with a large XFS volume (17TB) that mounts, but is not readable. I can view the folder structure on the volume but I can't access any of the actual data. A disk failed in a RAID5 array and while it has rebuilt now, it looks like it's caused serious data integrity issues.<br>
><br>
> Here is the CentOS release / Kernel version:<br>
> [root@svr608 ~]# uname -a<br>
> Linux svr608 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 04:16:51 EST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux<br>
> [root@svr608 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release<br>
> CentOS release 5.8 (Final)<br>
> [root@svr608 ~]# cat /tmp/yum.list | grep xfs | grep installed<br>
> kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-2 installed<br>
<br>
</div>You reall, Really, REALLY, *REALLY* want to remove kmod-xfs.<br>
<br>
RHEL5 has been shipping with supported xfs for what, 2 years now, and that old kmod-xfs<br>
is an ancient, ancient piece of unmaintained, bitrotting code. Sadly it overrides<br>
the kernel rpm's xfs.ko. I don't know if this is the root cause of your problem; probably<br>
not, but eventually it will likely be the root cause of some other problem :)<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
-Eric<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br>