<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt">Thank you very much :)<br><div><br></div><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> stress_buster <leo1783@yahoo.com><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Thu, April 7, 2011 10:52:19 PM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: xfsprogs<br></font><br>
On 4/7/11 9:04 AM, stress_buster wrote:<br>> <br>> Hi,<br>> <br>> My xfs_repair is bit old- 2.9. version.<br>> I'm considering installing latest available. But just worried because this<br>> is my production server and has some custom apps built into my OS. <br>> <br>> Is upgrading xfs_repair a high risk?<br><br>No.<br><br>> Also do I need to install latest xfsprogs or anyway only to upgrade<br>> xfs_repair from the package?<br>> I'm only would need xfs_repair mostly, so doesnt matter to me leaving<br>> others-mkfs.xfs etc in xfsprogs at the old version if that minimises the<br>> risk...<br><br>if you really want to try newer xfs_repair only, just build an xfsprogs tree and run from inside the tree.<br><br>> Any thoughts?<br><br>Just upgrade. ;)<br><br>-Eric<br></div></div>
</div></body></html>