[PATCH 67/71] xfs: fail ->bmap for reflink inodes

Darrick J. Wong darrick.wong at oracle.com
Tue Sep 6 11:26:51 CDT 2016


On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:29:48AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:39:13PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> > 
> > Have xfs_vm_bmap return zero for reflinked files.  This hack prevents
> > using a file with shared blocks as a swap file, because we don't want
> > to deal with CoW when we're (probably) low on memory.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> > [darrick.wong at oracle.com: add a more descriptive changelog]
> 
> Which happens to be incorrect :)  The swap code uses ->bmap to build
> a logical to physical block map at swapon time (to avoid allocations
> or even just block mappings under memory pressure I suspect).  This
> means we'd get reliable data corruption when COWing a swap file.

Yeah, at the time I thought I was going to write out a clever resolution to the
conflict between swap and CoW by using swap_activate to punch and fallocate all
the shared extents and turn off the inode reflink flag which would then enable
me to drop this patch altogether, but then got busy and forgot all about it.
Clearly I didn't fix the changelog here either. :(

"Have xfs_vm_bmap return zero for reflinked files because the bmap-based
swap code requires static block mappings, which is incompatible with
copy on write."

> 
> > +	 * The swap code (ab-)uses ->bmap to get a block mapping and then
> > +	 * bypasse?? the file system for actual I/O.  We really can't allow
> 
> Also it seems like I introduced some weird character instead of an
> "s" here..

Will fix that while I'm at it.

--D



More information about the xfs mailing list