[PATCH 18/20] xfs/128: use $XFS_FSR_PROG instead of xfs_fsr directly

Darrick J. Wong darrick.wong at oracle.com
Thu Jun 16 20:47:55 CDT 2016


Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong at oracle.com>
---
 tests/xfs/128 |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)


diff --git a/tests/xfs/128 b/tests/xfs/128
index 68f6f94..8758d7e 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/128
+++ b/tests/xfs/128
@@ -97,10 +97,10 @@ c14=$(_md5_checksum $testdir/file4)
 
 echo "Defragment"
 lsattr -l $testdir/ | _filter_scratch | _filter_spaces
-xfs_fsr -v -d $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full
-xfs_fsr -v -d $testdir/file2 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the link
-xfs_fsr -v -d $testdir/file3 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the link
-xfs_fsr -v -d $testdir/file4 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably ignores this file
+$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full
+$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file2 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the link
+$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file3 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the link
+$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file4 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably ignores this file
 _test_cycle_mount
 free_blocks3=$(stat -f $testdir -c '%f')
 



More information about the xfs mailing list