[PATCH 4/6] linux.h: Use off64_t instead of loff_t

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:00:01PM +0100, Felix Janda wrote:
> These are equivalent on glibc, while musl does not know loff_t.
> 
> In the long run, it would be preferable to enable transparent LFS so
> that off64_t could be replaced by off_t.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda at posteo.de>

Looks fine,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>