[PATCH 4/6] linux.h: Use off64_t instead of loff_t

Felix Janda felix.janda at posteo.de
Tue Jan 12 14:00:01 CST 2016


These are equivalent on glibc, while musl does not know loff_t.

In the long run, it would be preferable to enable transparent LFS so
that off64_t could be replaced by off_t.

Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda at posteo.de>
---
 include/linux.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux.h b/include/linux.h
index 827dbe1..4872a1e 100644
--- a/include/linux.h
+++ b/include/linux.h
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ platform_discard_blocks(int fd, uint64_t start, uint64_t len)
 #define EFSCORRUPTED	EUCLEAN	/* Filesystem is corrupted */
 #define EFSBADCRC	EBADMSG	/* Bad CRC detected */
 
-typedef loff_t		xfs_off_t;
+typedef off64_t	xfs_off_t;
 typedef uint64_t	xfs_ino_t;
 typedef uint32_t	xfs_dev_t;
 typedef int64_t	xfs_daddr_t;
-- 
2.4.10



More information about the xfs mailing list