[PATCH 4/6] linux.h: Use off64_t instead of loff_t
Felix Janda
felix.janda at posteo.de
Tue Jan 12 14:00:01 CST 2016
These are equivalent on glibc, while musl does not know loff_t.
In the long run, it would be preferable to enable transparent LFS so
that off64_t could be replaced by off_t.
Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda at posteo.de>
---
include/linux.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux.h b/include/linux.h
index 827dbe1..4872a1e 100644
--- a/include/linux.h
+++ b/include/linux.h
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ platform_discard_blocks(int fd, uint64_t start, uint64_t len)
#define EFSCORRUPTED EUCLEAN /* Filesystem is corrupted */
#define EFSBADCRC EBADMSG /* Bad CRC detected */
-typedef loff_t xfs_off_t;
+typedef off64_t xfs_off_t;
typedef uint64_t xfs_ino_t;
typedef uint32_t xfs_dev_t;
typedef int64_t xfs_daddr_t;
--
2.4.10
More information about the xfs
mailing list