[PATCH] xfs_db: pass the inode cluster offset when copying inodes
Darrick J. Wong
darrick.wong at oracle.com
Mon Aug 29 22:46:32 CDT 2016
In copy_inode_chunk, we try to determine whether or not an inode is
free as part of copying the inode records. The macros involved in
testing ir_free require both the inode record and the offset of an
inode within that chunk. Prior to sparse inode support, the loop
index "i" was also the inode chunk offset; however, when sparse
support was added, "i" became the inode offset within a cluster and
"ioff" became the inode cluster offset within an inode chunk.
Therefore, it is necessary to pass "ioff + i" to do the free-ness
calculation correctly.
This was discovered while trying to take metadumps of fs images for
scrub testing.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong at oracle.com>
---
db/metadump.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/db/metadump.c b/db/metadump.c
index e82b660..c769958 100644
--- a/db/metadump.c
+++ b/db/metadump.c
@@ -2292,7 +2292,7 @@ copy_inode_chunk(
/* process_inode handles free inodes, too */
if (!process_inode(agno, agino + ioff + i, dip,
- XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK(rp, i)))
+ XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK(rp, ioff + i)))
goto pop_out;
inodes_copied++;
More information about the xfs
mailing list