[PATCH 3/5] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster has range issues

Brian Foster bfoster at redhat.com
Wed Apr 6 07:52:02 CDT 2016


On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 07:22:52PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner at redhat.com>
> 
> xfs_iflush_cluster() does a gang lookup on the radix tree, meaning
> it can find inode beyond the current cluster if there is sparse

	      inodes

> cache population. gang lookups return results in ascending index
> order, so stop trying to cluster iodes once the first inode outside

				   inodes

> the cluster mask is detected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner at redhat.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster at redhat.com>

>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 6598104..b984be4 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -3194,11 +3194,20 @@ xfs_iflush_cluster(
>  		 */
>  		spin_lock(&cip->i_flags_lock);
>  		if (!cip->i_ino ||
> -		    __xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_ISTALE) ||
> -		    (XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, cip->i_ino) & mask) != first_index) {
> +		    __xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_ISTALE)) {
>  			spin_unlock(&cip->i_flags_lock);
>  			continue;
>  		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Once we fall off the end of the cluster, no point checking
> +		 * any more inodes in the list because they will also all be
> +		 * outside the cluster.
> +		 */
> +		if ((XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, cip->i_ino) & mask) != first_index) {
> +			spin_unlock(&cip->i_flags_lock);
> +			break;
> +		}
>  		spin_unlock(&cip->i_flags_lock);
>  
>  		/*
> -- 
> 2.7.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs at oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



More information about the xfs mailing list