[RFC PATCH] xfs: support for non-mmu architectures
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
Thu Nov 19 17:24:55 CST 2015
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:46:21AM +0200, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> Naive implementation for non-mmu architectures: allocate physically
> contiguous xfs buffers with alloc_pages. Terribly inefficient with
> memory and fragmentation on high I/O loads but it may be good enough
> for basic usage (which most non-mmu architectures will need).
Can you please explain why you want to use XFS on low end, basic
non-MMU devices? XFS is a high performance, enterprise/HPC level
filesystem - it's not a filesystem designed for small IoT level
devices - so I'm struggling to see why we'd want to expend any
effort to make XFS work on such devices....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
More information about the xfs
mailing list