[PATCH v2 03/11] pmem: enable REQ_FUA/REQ_FLUSH handling
Dan Williams
dan.j.williams at intel.com
Mon Nov 16 11:28:59 CST 2015
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz> wrote:
> On Mon 16-11-15 14:37:14, Jan Kara wrote:
[..]
> But a question: Won't it be better to do sfence + pcommit only in response
> to REQ_FLUSH request and don't do it after each write? I'm not sure how
> expensive these instructions are but in theory it could be a performance
> win, couldn't it? For filesystems this is enough wrt persistency
> guarantees...
We would need to gather the performance data... The expectation is
that the cache flushing is more expensive than the sfence + pcommit.
More information about the xfs
mailing list