[PATCH v2 1/5] xfs_repair: refuse to run if we don't recognize version or feature flags
Darrick J. Wong
darrick.wong at oracle.com
Wed May 27 11:42:31 CDT 2015
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:19:00PM +0200, Fanael Linithien wrote:
> > Apparently xfs_repair running on a v5 filesystem doesn't check the
> > compat, rocompat, or incompat feature flags for bits that it doesn't
> > know about, which means that old xfs_repairs can wreak havoc. So,
> > strengthen the checks to prevent repair from "repairing" anything it
> > doesn't understand.
> >
> > v2: Move the complaint code after the version number check, and print
> > the actual feature bits that we don't recognize.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong at oracle.com>
> > ---
> > repair/versions.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/repair/versions.c b/repair/versions.c
> > index c1dff72..dbe41a4 100644
> > --- a/repair/versions.c
> > +++ b/repair/versions.c
> > @@ -175,6 +175,39 @@ _("WARNING: you have disallowed
> superblock-feature-bits-allowed\n"
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + /* Look for V5 feature flags we don't know about */
> > + if (XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(sb) >= XFS_SB_VERSION_5) {
> > + if (xfs_sb_has_ro_compat_feature(sb,
> > + XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN)) {
> > + do_warn(
> > +_("Superblock has unknown read-only compatible features (0x%x)
> enabled.\n"
> > +"Using a more recent xfs_repair is recommended.\n"),
> > + sb->sb_features_ro_compat &
> > + XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN);
> > + issue_warning = 1;
> > + }
> > + if (xfs_sb_has_incompat_feature(sb,
> > + XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_UNKNOWN)) {
> > + do_warn(
> > +_("Superblock has unknown read-only compatible features (0x%x)
> enabled.\n"
> > +"Using a more recent xfs_repair is recommended.\n"),
> > + sb->sb_features_ro_compat &
> > + XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN);
>
> Copy/paste error, do you mean incompat?
>
> > + issue_warning = 1;
> > + }
> > + if (xfs_sb_has_compat_feature(sb,
> > + XFS_SB_FEAT_COMPAT_UNKNOWN)) {
> > + do_warn(
> > +_("Superblock has unknown compatible features (0x%x) enabled.\n"
> > +"Using a more recent xfs_repair is recommended.\n"),
> > + sb->sb_features_ro_compat &
> > + XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN);
>
> compat here?
Err, yes. Thank you for catching all these. No more patching past 10pm for
me.... :)
--D
>
> > + issue_warning = 1;
> > + }
> > + if (issue_warning)
> > + return 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (xfs_sb_version_hasattr(sb)) {
> > if (!fs_attributes_allowed) {
> > if (!no_modify) {
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs at oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
More information about the xfs
mailing list