[RFC PATCH 0/6] xfs: truncate vs page fault IO exclusion
Jan Kara
jack at suse.cz
Mon Jan 12 11:42:58 CST 2015
On Thu 08-01-15 04:24:48, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This patchset passes xfstests and various benchmarks and stress
> > workloads, so the real question is now:
> >
> > What have I missed?
> >
> > Comments, thoughts, flames?
>
> Why is this done in XFS and not in generic code?
I was also thinking about this. In the end I decided not to propose this
since the new rw-lock would grow struct inode and is actually necessary
only for filesystems implementing hole punching AFAICS. And that isn't
supported by that many filesystems. So fs private implementation which
isn't that complicated looked like a reasonable solution to me...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
More information about the xfs
mailing list