[PATCH 05/11] xfsprogs: missing and dummy calls for OS X support

Jan Tulak jtulak at redhat.com
Wed Aug 19 04:14:42 CDT 2015


On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch at infradead.org>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 07:45:57AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Hmmm, looks like I accidentally comitted an earlier version of this
> > patch yesterday. Jan, can you send delta patches to what I committed
> > to address more recent review comments? Sorry, my bad.

I guess my chaotic versioning can be blamed. :-)

> Can you revert it for now? I think most of these changes are incorrect

I agree, revert seems like a better idea. Especially if we want to split
things
like removing the XATTR_ dependency move into standalone commits.

> and should either be dropped for now by disabling fsx

I proposed dropping some tools earlier, but there was a valid point about
the possibility to break something when not even trying to compile it.
i.e. with the XATTR_ -> XFS_XATTR mentioned in the first reply to this patch
(which I already moved to a separate patch), it is necessary to add

#include "xfs/xfs_arch.h"
#include "xfs/xfs_format.h"

into libhandle/handle.c. But
​
I found
​
this
​
when I tried to compile it. If it was
in fsr and fsr wasn't compiling, I would most likely send a patch which
would
be thrown
​
back
​
on my head immediately. ;-)

So I think
​ ​
it is better to have "bad dummy stuff" than not compile it
at all
​
.

> or will need
​
a major rework.

Working on it. :-)

Cheers,
Jan

--
Jan Tulak
jtulak at redhat.com / jan at tulak.me
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20150819/187cb096/attachment.html>


More information about the xfs mailing list