[PATCH v2 1/4] xfsprogs: Prefix LIST_... macros to XFS_LIST_...
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
Mon Aug 3 17:16:30 CDT 2015
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 05:34:48AM -0400, Jan Tulak wrote:
> > From: "Dave Chinner" <david at fromorbit.com>
> > What macros, and how do we get them included in the build? I
> > shouldn't need to go and use google to work out why a change is
> > beign made....
> >
> > This is supposed to match what is required for libxfs/ so we don't
> > have to modify the kernel code we bring across. Without knowing
> > exactly how we are including conflicting definitions from the OS X
> > include files, it's really hard to suggest other possible
> > solutions...
> >
>
> Ahh, sorry, I already wrote a reply to Chris, but it looks like
> I pressed "save" instead "send" - I found it in drafts and not
> in send emails. /shy
No worries, we all do silly things like that from time to time,
myself included.
> Sure, these:
>
> ../include/xfs/list.h:32:9: warning: 'LIST_HEAD' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
> #define LIST_HEAD(name) \
> ^
> /usr/include/sys/queue.h:417:9: note: previous definition is here
> #define LIST_HEAD(name, type) \
> ^
> (and the same for LIST_HEAD_INIT)
>
> sys/queue.h is not linked directly, but from many system libraries.
> A quick grep on /usr/include/ shows 24 header files including the queue,
> sys/mount.h one of them. And I didn't found a way how to avoid it.
Ok, so 4.4BSD introduced these years ago. Now it rings a bell, but I
can't find the relevant thread I'm thinking of (google has become
almost useless as a mailing list search engine in recent times).
I suspect that we are going to need an
#undef LIST_HEAD
somewhere in include/libxfs.h, libxfs/libxfs_priv.h and/or
include/list.h just to ensure we don't use the system definitions
(with a large comment explaining it).
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
More information about the xfs
mailing list