[PATCH 4/9] xfsdump: remove pointless if (dirty);

Mark Tinguely tinguely at sgi.com
Thu Nov 13 13:02:54 CST 2014


On 11/13/14 11:47, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 11/13/14 11:35 AM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>> On 11/12/14 12:57, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> "dirty" seems to be a remnant of unfinished code; other bits of
>>> it are there but commented out, so comment out "if (dirty);" as
>>> well, which is a no-op if statement which can't be true.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen<sandeen at redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>    inventory/inv_stobj.c |    2 ++
>>>    1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/inventory/inv_stobj.c b/inventory/inv_stobj.c
>>> index becac17..84b15d9 100644
>>> --- a/inventory/inv_stobj.c
>>> +++ b/inventory/inv_stobj.c
>>> @@ -976,7 +976,9 @@ stobj_delete_mobj(int fd,
>>>
>>>            }
>>>            free ( mfiles );
>>> +/*
>>>            if ( dirty );
>>> +*/
>>>        }
>>>
>>>        free ( strms );
>>
>> Why not remove all the references to dirty in the function?
>> Like you said, it doesn't do anything.
>
> Somebody left this and the rest of the commented-out code there
> for some documentation reason, it seems, so I figured...
>
> It's not like the rest of the code is a thing
> of beauty, and this wart is ruining its perfection.  ;)
>
> I have no idea, honestly.  xfsdump is dropped in from some alien
> world.  Somebody @ SGI might know, or could find out by looking
> at long-lost history?
>
> -Eric

I will see what I can dig up.

We need to start pulling off the warts.

The interactive command line parsing is also damaged, I will find the 
patch and post it.

--Mark.




More information about the xfs mailing list