[PATCH 3/5] xfs: fold xfs_attr_remove_int into xfs_attr_remove

Brian Foster bfoster at redhat.com
Mon May 5 16:08:32 CDT 2014


On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 06:56:53AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:21:28PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 05:20:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Also remove a useless ilock roundtrip for the first attr fork check, it's
> > > racy anyway and we redo it later under the ilock before we start the removal.
> > > 
> > > Plus various minor style fixes to the new xfs_attr_remove.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> .....
> > > @@ -487,35 +497,26 @@ xfs_attr_remove_int(xfs_inode_t *dp, struct xfs_name *name, int flags)
> > >  	 */
> > >  	xfs_trans_ijoin(args.trans, dp, 0);
> > >  
> > > -	/*
> > > -	 * Decide on what work routines to call based on the inode size.
> > > -	 */
> > >  	if (!xfs_inode_hasattr(dp)) {
> > >  		error = XFS_ERROR(ENOATTR);
> > 
> > I suppose we probably want to nuke the XFS_ERROR() while we're here..?
> > Otherwise, it looks good.
> 
> No need, I'll do that at the end of the dev cycle for everything.
> 

Sounds good.

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster at redhat.com>

> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> 
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david at fromorbit.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs at oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



More information about the xfs mailing list