[PATCH] xfstests: add test for btrfs send issuing premature rmdir operations

Filipe David Manana fdmanana at gmail.com
Mon Feb 24 05:58:32 CST 2014


On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Dave Chinner <david at fromorbit.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:32:32PM +0000, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
>> Regression test for btrfs incremental send issue where a rmdir instruction
>> is sent against an orphan directory inode which is not empty yet, causing
>> btrfs receive to fail when it attempts to remove the directory.
>>
>> This issue is fixed by the following linux kernel btrfs patch:
>>
>>    Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  tests/btrfs/041     |  153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  tests/btrfs/041.out |    1 +
>>  tests/btrfs/group   |    1 +
>>  3 files changed, 155 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/041
>>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/041.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/041 b/tests/btrfs/041
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 0000000..9de9326
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/041
>> @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# FS QA Test No. btrfs/041
>> +#
>> +# Regression test for btrfs incremental send issue where a rmdir instruction
>> +# is sent against an orphan directory inode which is not empty yet, causing
>> +# btrfs receive to fail when it attempts to remove the directory.
>> +#
>> +# This issue is fixed by the following linux kernel btrfs patch:
>> +#
>> +#   Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories
>> +#
>> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> +# Copyright (c) 2014 Filipe Manana.  All Rights Reserved.
>> +#
>> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> +#
>> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
>> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
>> +#
>> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
>> +# Inc.,  51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
>> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> +#
>> +
>> +seq=`basename $0`
>> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
>> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
>> +
>> +here=`pwd`
>> +tmp=`mktemp -d`
>> +status=1     # failure is the default!
>> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
>> +
>> +_cleanup()
>> +{
>> +    rm -fr $tmp
>> +}
>> +
>> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
>> +. ./common/rc
>> +. ./common/filter
>> +
>> +# real QA test starts here
>> +_supported_fs btrfs
>> +_supported_os Linux
>> +_require_scratch
>> +_need_to_be_root
>> +
>> +FSSUM_PROG=$here/src/fssum
>> +[ -x $FSSUM_PROG ] || _notrun "fssum not built"
>
> This is duplicated across several tests now. Perhaps this should be
> factored now into a _requires_fssum helper (separate patch is
> fine)?
>
>> +
>> +_scratch_unmount
>> +_check_btrfs_filesystem $SCRATCH_DEV
>
> you should be able to use _check_scratch_fs() here. I note that the
> btrfs path does not unmount the scratch device, so you should update
> it to do so (like _check_xfs_filesytem does) and then
> _check_scratch_fs() will just Do The Right Thing.
>
>> +_scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1
>> +_scratch_mount
>> +
>> +_run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/1.snap
>> +run_check $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 2>> $seqres.full
>> +
>> +_run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/2.snap
>> +run_check $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/2.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 2>> $seqres.full
>
> Hasn't run_check already redirected everything to $seqres.full?
>
>> +_scratch_unmount
>> +_check_btrfs_filesystem $SCRATCH_DEV
>
> _check_scratch_fs() here too.
>
> Cheers,

All done in V2 (same for the other test).
For the require_fssum() function, I made a patch on top of these 2 so
that it updates all existing btrfs tests that need fssum ("[PATCH]
xfstests: add function _require_fssum()").

Thanks for the good suggestions Dave.

>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david at fromorbit.com



-- 
Filipe David Manana,

"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
 Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
 That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."



More information about the xfs mailing list