On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 04:16:24PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > FWIW, there's a funny situation - all users of dequeue_signal_lock() > actually ignore info completely. I'm not saying that we ought to > stop returning it, but e.g. jbd part of that patch is simply s/jbd/jffs2/, obviously. Sorry... And yes, nbd and usb_storage are the same story.