3.14.0-rc2: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:1007
Christian Kujau
lists at nerdbynature.de
Thu Feb 13 19:22:06 CST 2014
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 at 12:14, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > OK, so the "possible irq lock inversion dependency detected" is a lockdep
> > regression, as you explained in the xfs-list thread. What about the
> > "RECLAIM_FS-safe -> RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock order detected" warning - I
> > haven't seen it again though, only once with 3.14.0-rc2.
>
> That was also an i_lock/mmapsem issue, so it's likely to be the same
> root cause. I'm testing a fix for it at the moment.
Understood. Thanks for looking into this.
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #129:
The ring needs another token
More information about the xfs
mailing list