[PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/004: fix to make test really work

[Wang Shilong]

Hi Josef,

On 02/11/2014 03:18 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>
>
> On 02/10/2014 07:10 AM, Wang Shilong wrote:
>> From: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com>
>>
>> So i was wandering why test 004 could pass my previous wrong
>> kernel patch while it defenitely should not.
>>
>> By some debugging, i found here perl script is wrong, we did not
>> filter out anything and this unit test did not work acutally.so
>> it came out we will never fail this test.
>>
>
> So now with this patch I'm failing it, is there some btrfs patch I 
> need to make it not fail or is it still not supposed to fail normally 
> and is this patch broken?  Thanks,
You should not have updated my previous patch(Btrfs: switch to 
btrfs_previous_extent_item()) when you fail this test.
I update your latest btrfs-next which has updated my previous patch and 
it can pass this case, did you miss that?

Thanks,
Wang
>
> Josef
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>