syslinux xfs support
Chris Murphy
lists at colorremedies.com
Wed Oct 16 00:48:49 CDT 2013
On Oct 15, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Dave Chinner <david at fromorbit.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 01:33:19PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Hi Paulo,
>>
>> just wondering what the state of the xfs support for syslinux is? I
>> talked to Peter at Linuxcon and he thought it's merged, but looking at
>> the kernel.org tree I can't find the support.
>>
>> Also when looking over your branches I noticed that you're using a free
>> sector in the first filesystem block to store the bootloader. If we
>> want to go down that route we need to make sure to reserve this sector,
>> otherwise it might get taken up by newly added metadata.
>
> It's also worth pointing out that there's no guarantee that there's
> a free sector in the first filesystem block. It's only by luck that
> there's free sectors on the default config (512 byte sector, 4
> sector sized AG headers, 4k filesystem block). If we have <= 2k filesystem
> block there are no free "pad" sectors that can be used, 4k sectors
> mean no free sectors either, etc.
>
> Much better would be to create a sector sized file and use fiemap to
> get the disk address of the block and feed that into the
> bootloader. That works for all filesystems without needing to know
> anything about the underlying filesystem structures……
I'm curious how that would work.
The minimum bit of code for GRUB or extlinux is a lot bigger than 4KB. A basic self-generated GRUB configuration file is 5.6KB; for extlinux a basic one I have is 518 bytes. The minimum code needed to find the configuration file is ~26KB for GRUB's core.img, and ~34KB for extlinux's ldlinux.sys.
So are both of you referring to the < 440 bytes of bootstrap code that goes in either the MBR or VBR, whose job is to find core.img or ldlinux.sys and blindly load them?
Chris Murphy
More information about the xfs
mailing list