[PATCH] xfs: fix the comment explaining xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin

[Ben Myers]

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:34:15AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Not the most important patch ever, but I think it should still be picked
> up :)

Sure.  We'll get it in once the merge window closes.

-Ben

> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:45:36AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> > index cd2a10e..4117286 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> > @@ -295,8 +295,8 @@ xfs_trans_mod_dquot(
> >  /*
> >   * Given an array of dqtrx structures, lock all the dquots associated and join
> >   * them to the transaction, provided they have been modified.  We know that the
> > - * highest number of dquots of one type - usr, grp OR prj - involved in a
> > - * transaction is 2 so we don't need to make this very generic.
> > + * highest number of dquots of one type - usr, grp and prj - involved in a
> > + * transaction is 3 so we don't need to make this very generic.
> >   */
> >  STATIC void
> >  xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin(
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > xfs mailing list
> > xfs at oss.sgi.com
> > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> ---end quoted text---
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs at oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs